There is no simple formula for evaluating sources; evaluation always depends on the type of assignment and course expectations. Here is a basic framework you can use to evaluate and analyze how well your sources support it:
1. Is the source useful to you?
Does it provide the kind of information you need?
Does it meet your assignment requirements?
How does the source relate to other sources you've found?
What does the source add to the conversation: does it deepen your understanding of the topic or argument?
2. Is this the type of source your audience expects you to use?
Does this argument or topic call for a scholarly source or a more popular source?
Will it give you more credibility with your audience if you use it?
3. Who created the source?
Is the author identified? If so, are they someone you find credible?
If the author is not identified, is there a group or institution responsible for the source? Do you find that group credible?
How do you know if the work is credible?
4. What is the author’s (or institution’s or agency’s) purpose in creating this source?
Are they trying to persuade you to do or think something specific?
Are they selling something?
Does their purpose or agenda affect the quality of their evidence?
5. If the source is scholarly, is it a good example of research in the discipline?
Do they use citations, footnotes, etc. to connect their work to the rest of the field?
Is the source referenced (used and cited) by other scholars you’ve found?
Is it current enough to meet your needs?
Was it published in a journal or other source important in the field? How do you know?
This framework is adapted from a guide created by Oregon State University librarian Anne-Marie Deitering under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License.